current issue

Leaders Journal Blog

Sunday, June 29, 2008

The Case of the Shattered Coffee Pot in the Ice Machine

It was a hot summer Saturday back in 1987. I had recently been transferred to the North Rangeline (North) McDonald's Store. I was moved there because I had earned a reputation as a powerful motivator and great teacher. And, to put it simply, North needed that -- desperately. On my third Saturday there (a scorcher), we were just finishing the breakfast rush and getting ready to transition to lunch (always a chaotic time). One of the employees came running over to me with a cup full of ice (she was about to fill a drink order for the drive thru). She frantically pointed out the quarter-sized piece of glass in the ice. I quickly checked our ice machine and saw the remnants of a shattered glass coffee pot. One of the crew had done it. (Luckily, this was our first soda of the day so no customers were affected.)

The first thing we had to do was shut down the machine and pull all of the ice out of the ice bin stations in both the drive thru and the front line. Those had to be thoroughly and carefully cleaned. I pulled out petty cash and sent an employee to the grocery store to buy up bags of ice. I called other McDonald's nearby and arranged to have an employee come by with plastic bins to collect some ice. Once the immediate situation was taken care of, I knew that I had to handle the more difficult part of it: taking care of the employees who did it.

Although there were no witnesses, I had a strong suspicion of who had done it, as did all the other employees. There were three employees who were extremely disgruntled and unhappy. They were also the three most knowledgeable and potentially best employees that I had ever worked with. I sent them on break together to give myself time to collect my thoughts. I grabbed a cup of coffee and headed back to the break room. As I entered the break room, they all looked up at me, expectantly and not without some hostility. I asked them if they would mind if I sat down with them for a minute. I could tell that was not what they were expecting! Then, I asked them if they'd be willing to talk for a few minutes and I assured them that I would add that time onto their break time. Then I said, "I wonder if you guys could help me out. About what just happened with the ice -- to me, that is a clear symptom of what's going on in this store. You guys have been here a long time, you know the store and you know your jobs. What do you think the real problems are?"

About 15 minutes later, they stopped talking. I had taken notes. I summarized the points they had made (for the most part, they were all valid) and then I said "Thank you for taking the time to be so upfront with me. I am going to work my hardest to bring about changes. I am going to work my tail off to make things better. I won't be able to do that overnight, but I will work to bring about changes as quickly as possible. I hope that you will be with me in making these changes." Then I stood up and said "So, I'll see you up front in about 20 minutes or so?" All three stood up and said "No, we will go back with you now."

In all the hard work that was before me, these three employees worked as hard and as loyally as anyone else. The fact that I listened to them spread throughout the store, among all the different shifts, and I became the manager that people trusted enough to talk to. That was essential. I needed to hear what was really going on. Of course, I also had to do something as well, otherwise I would have lost that trust. Together we turned that store into a place where employees worked with pride. Within three months, we turned the reputation of the store around. As a direct result of my hard work at North, I was awarded the opportunity to become a Store Manager at another nearby McDonalds. I gladly welcomed that challenge. When I announced that I would be leaving and going to the other store, about half of the employees at North put in their request to be transferred to the store I was going to (and, the same thing happened at the Main Street Store (the store I had been at before North)!). Sadly, the regional supervisor limited the amount of transfers I could accept. One of those that wanted to transfer -- and one I accepted -- was one of the women who, I believe, broke the coffee pot in the ice machine. From that day on, she was one of the best and most loyal employees that I ever worked with.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Manage the results, not the actions

The older I get, the wiser my parents get. I've come to realize that my Dad was a master teacher and motivator. Whenever I had some new skill to learn or job to do, my Dad would explain it (and why it was important), he would explain the result or outcome we wanted, he would demonstrate how it was done, he would watch me as I did it, he would provide feedback on my performance, and then, when I looked liked I had a handle on it, he would walk away and leave me to do my job. Of course, he always said, "If you run into trouble or if you have any questions, just come get me." By walking away, he turned the responsibility of the outcome over to me.

When I was first became a store manager at McDonalds back in the 1980s, other store managers warned me that since I was working with primarily kids, I would need to become a micro manager; I would need to be looking over their shoulder every step of the way. This didn't seem realistic to me. How could I be looking over everybody's shoulder all the time?

I didn't want to manage actions; I wanted to manage results. I trained my team as my Dad had trained me. Confident that they knew what to do, how to do it, and the result we were looking for, I walked away. Well, I walked away to the front line where I had a birds-eye view of the results: I could see the product, I could see the service, I could see and interact with customers. If there was a problem (which was rare), I knew it almost instantly and could deal with it immediately -- usually well before it reached a customer.

It isn't simply a coincidence that I had the lowest employee turnover, the highest PAC (profit after controllables), and tremendous customer loyalty. Best of all, to me, is that we had an environment where my team got to shine. One of the best compliments I ever received was from a 17 year-old young man who had worked for me for over a year (he was a star performer!). One day he told me, "You're the only adult I know who trusts me to be responsible. That's why I love my job."

Labels: , , ,

Monday, June 23, 2008

Who Says You Can't Herd Cats?

In the evening, I like to sit out in my backyard and read for awhile. I generally take two of my cats, Boo and Scout, with me. All is well (they love being outside!), right up until the time when it’s time for us to go in for the evening. I have to round them up. Typically this involves me chasing them or crawling around in the planting beds. Once I catch them, they growl and hiss and, in general, let me know that they are not pleased with me.

Tonight, however, was different. It was a long day and I didn’t feel like participating in the usual evening spectacle. I went upstairs, grabbed the little bag of cat treats and shook the bag from the top of the stairs. Both cats came running at top speed and gave no argument about coming in. Why didn’t I think of this before?

The cats reminded me of a few important steps to affecting change:

1. Decide that you will no longer participate in the spectacle.

2. Decipher and understand the competing motivations of others. This isn’t quite as simple as "What does the other person want?" The cats wanted to stay outside! Their competing motivation was that they also wanted the treats. Tonight they wanted the treat more than they wanted to stay where they were.

3. A key to getting people to change is to get them to want something new more than they want to stay where they are. My mother was a hard-core smoker for 50 years. Last June, her doctors told her that she had a choice: she could continue to smoke. If she chose that she would be dead within a few months and most of that time, she would spend in the hospital. Or, she could quit smoking, have more time with her family, and spend most of that time at home. She quit that day.

Certainly, these are not all the steps of change, but, most likely, change won’t happen without these three. As for the cats, well, as Scarlett always said, "Tomorrow is another day" and I’m sure they are busy plotting their revenge.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 6, 2008

Staying focused when thousands are cheering against you

I love tennis and I've been watching the French Open. Like many tennis fans, I am truly amazed by Roger Federer and his amazing tennis talent. What I find to be perhaps even more amazing is his ability to manage his emotions. Today he played a Frenchman in the semi-finals and, not surprisingly, the crowd was behind the Frenchman. I could feel myself getting upset for Federer yet he remained calm and focused.

The other thing I notice about Federer is that in his post-match interviews, he is able to give incredibly accurate analysis of the match. He is unafraid to say where he struggled and he is not ashamed to say where he played great. And, he does this without any sort of arrogance; it's just a matter-of-fact analysis of the match. I've seen other players who have played a great match and yet in their post-match interview, they say that they "got lucky" or "managed to put some points together." I wonder: do they really believe that or are they afraid that they might come across as arrogant? There is nothing wrong with luck; however, if we think that we only win or do well when we are lucky, we are mentally chipping away at our own optimism and confidence. I am sure that Federer will accept all the luck he can get while he plays Nadal in the final; however, he is not relying solely on luck. It seems as though Federer has an exceptional ability to assess the game dispassionately and analyze what he has done that works, that hasn't worked, and what he simply needs to next.

Labels:

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

The Energy of Passion

Last night, Rick and I were watching the Cubs game (Go Cubs!!). Tommy Lasorda did the 7th Inning stretch and then he spent some time in the booth with the announcers. When I saw him, I thought "Wow. He hasn't changed a bit." I had the same thought as I listened to him passionately talk about baseball. He has such an amazing feel and knowledge of the game. He understands and talks about all those little intuitive things about baseball that the casual fan would likely miss. It's not surprising since he spent 59 years with the Dodgers.

What did surprise me was when they said that he was 80 years old. Here is someone who is helping to re-define age. He didn't look like nor talk like someone who is "old." As I listened to him, it occurred to me why: he is so passionate about what he has done -- and is still doing -- in life. That passion brings vibrancy. Vibrancy has nothing to do with age.

Or does it? Perhaps vibrancy can only come when you've experienced enough of life -- the ups, the downs, the challenges, the heartbreaks, the joys, and the realized dreams -- to truly be engaged and passionate about what it is that you do? Does the range of emotions that we experience in our lives allow us to enjoy, at a much deeper level, those things that we love? I don't know. What I do know is how inspiring it is to witness someone who is so engaged and passionate about what it is that they are doing. Maybe that is the elixir for vibrancy?

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 15, 2008

The perception that stunk up the farm!

Years ago, my Dad had a favorite cat, Kitty Mow-Mow (he named it!), who was a pure black cat. She would sit out in the barn in the early morning and wait by the door for my Dad to come in. When he would come in, he would always bend down and pet her for a few minutes. One early Saturday morning, while it was still just a little dark outside, Dad walked into the barn, bent down and started petting Kitty Mow-Mow. After a couple of minutes, Dad noticed that Kitty Mow-Mow had a white stripe running down her back. It was at that moment that he realized that this wasn't Kitty Mow-Mow. It was a skunk. He jumped. The skunk jumped. And the whole farm stunk for the next few days.

It's always been fascinating to me that the skunk allowed my Dad to pet it. In fact, there wasn't any problem at all until my Dad realized it was a skunk and he jumped (which startled the skunk). So, in a sense, when my Dad's perception of the situation changed, the situation changed.

How many times do we allow our perceptions to shape our reality? Often. Our perceptions filter the things that we experience and the thoughts we have about those experiences. More than that, our perceptions also shape our actions.

Back in 2003 when I got sick and collapsed, the doctor gave me the diagnosis and said that only about 5% of the people ever experience a full recovery. He urged me to think of myself as being in that 5%. To me, there was never any doubt that I was in the 5%. The truth is that I don't know if I was in the 5% or not. But I learned what the people who had recovered had done and I was intensely disciplined in doing what it was I had to do in order to recover.

It gets tricky, doesn't it? Was I just lucky and was in that 5%? Or did my hard work, discipline and my belief that I was in the 5% lead to my eventual full recovery? (Or more accurately, did my belief that I was in the 5% lead to my hard work, determination and discipline?) I tend to believe that it was my perception and belief that led me to not give up. The full recovery took about five years. At any point along the way, it would have been so easy to give up. To think that I would never really be well again. Instead my doctor urged me to view any relapse as just a temporary set back.

Certainly, just believing in the positive outcome alone probably wouldn't have done the trick. Like so many times in our lives, it is that powerful combination of belief and smart, hard work that ultimately leads to the positive outcome we desire.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Assume Positive Intent

Fortune Magazine had their "Best Advice" issue (May 12, 2008). While there were many great pieces of advice, one really stood out for me. It was by Indra Nooyi (Chairman and CEO of Pepsi): "Whatever anybody says or does, assume positive intent . . . . When you assume negative intent, you're angry."

This is a behavior that I need to improve on. It's so easy to see a behavior and assume the worst -- or even just assume that we know that person's motivation. However, by following Nooyi's advice and assuming positive intent, we allow ourselves room to explore (and, at the very least, we save ourselves from some unnecessary anger).

When I was in Missouri when my mom was dying, my sisters and I took shifts at the hospital with mom. I had left the hospital around four in the morning. At 7:30 that morning, my sister called and told me that I needed to get back -- mom had taken a sharp turn for the worse. I jumped in the car and started driving. As luck would have it, the town was having it's city-wide garage sale. This meant that a number of the streets were blocked off and that people were driving very slow so that they could peruse the different sales from their cars. I was frantic! I had the misfortune of getting behind one pick-up truck who was going very, very slow and who was driving in the center of the road. I tried tapping the horn and trying to signal that I needed to get around him. That just made him slow down. It's entirely possible that he thought I was just being an impatient, obnoxious driver. He had no way of knowing that I was desperately trying to get to my mother's side before she died. I am remembering that as I am driving in the city: when someone cuts me off or is driving impatiently, I remind myself that I don't know where they are going or what their circumstances are. It allows me to be a little more patient, a little more forgiving. It also saves me from expending -- and wasting -- energy on being angry.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

You need more than a hammer

Several years ago I read a book called In Harm's Way by Doug Stanton. It's the story of the USS Indianapolis and is a fascinating and horrifying read. One of the stories is about two survivors, McCoy and Brundige, who, along with several others, floated in a damaged life boat for over four days waiting to be rescued. As the hours went by, they watched the sharks attack others and they watched their friends die. They didn't have any food or water and the sun, during the day, was blistering their skin. At night, the temperature dipped and their core body temperatures fell dangerously low. As the hours turned into days, other boys would give up, take off their life jackets and dive into the water, knowing that the sharks would come for them and end their pain. When the third day rolled around and they were both severely dehydrated and burned, they started betting each other who would die first. They each swore that it would be the other one because they each claimed that they were the toughest and strongest. From that point on, giving up wasn't an option. They had something to prove, something to live for. Mercifully, they were rescued on the fourth day.

This story is a powerful reminder that in communication, in relationships, in leadership, there is never just one way to do anything all the time. Whereas early on in the disaster, McCoy would seek to reassure the other boys that help was on the way, there came a point where reassurance and comfort wasn't going to work anymore. That was the time to challenge their pride or their toughness. Too often we rely on what we know best or what feels best and we fail to recognize that we need to use a different tool.

This is when our empathy makes a massive difference. We need to able to understand what the other person is going through and what they need to hear at the time, instead of simply saying what we need to say. Sometimes that might be support, sometimes it might be comfort and sometimes it might be a challenge. The key is that we have to pay attention. We don't get to operate on autopilot. I know we've probably all heard this quote by Abraham Maslow, but it is extremely wise and bears repeating:"If the only tool you have is a hammer, you will see every problem as a nail."

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, May 5, 2008

Yesterday's War

I have been reading Who Says Elephants Can't Dance by Louis Gerstner, Jr. It's the story of how he turned IBM around. It is a fascinating book. He discusses the strategy that they used and something he said caught my eye: he said that they had to stop fighting yesterday's war, they had already lost that and it was time to move on. How many times do we do that in both our personal and professional lives?

It might be some injustice that we suffered or some hurt that someone caused us. Months and even years after the event, we sometimes find ourselves still suffering or fighting that war. It's over. There is nothing to be gained by continuing to fight once you've lost the battle. As George Patton once said, "When the horse is dead, dismount." So, why do we continue the battle? I think that it's because we can't stand that someone hurt us or treated us unfairly and we weren't able to prevent it. For me, I've often wondered who I was more upset with: the person who trespassed or myself for not preventing it?

I remember a conversation I had with my Mom years ago. She had been deeply hurt by her sisters. She held on to that pain for decades. That didn't hurt her sisters -- it only hurt her. One day (years after the event) she was worked up about it and obviously in pain over it. I took her hand and I said, "Mom, let it go. You are only hurting yourself. Yes, what they did was wrong and I know that it hurt you. But now you are hurting yourself." I am sure that there was probably a more skilled way of saying that and I don't think I helped her at all. But I remember witnessing her turmoil and seeing that while her sisters had perpetrated the first offense, she had continued to cause pain to herself by holding onto it. It was a really sad example of yesterday's war being lost but not over -- and she was the only one still fighting it. I try to remember this incident and use it as a yellow flag to myself when I find myself ruminating over stuff that is in the past.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Creating opportunities where others see problems

In the March 31, 2008 issue of Fortune Magazine, there is a fascinating article about Target. There is one incident, in particular, which I found intriguing. Back in 1998, Target had donated money towards the renovation of the Washington Monument. When one of the Target executives, Bob Thacker (who was then the VP of Marketing), visited the site. He found the Target logo next to some rotting scaffolding and ripped plastic. This was unthinkable for the sacred logo: it wasn't the right public image for the logo (which represents the brand) to be associated with decline and decay. It was the right public image to be supporting the project, however. Target came up with a brilliant solution: instead of pulling their funds or creating a stir, they decided to sponsor a contest for architects to see who could come up with the best and most innovative design for scaffolding (which, of course, would look appropriate next to the Target logo). Guess who won that competition? Michael Graves. Upon winning the competition, Graves met Thacker. Graves pulled out a large binder -- full of product designs -- and asked Thacker if Target would have any interest in them. It's still a partnership which is going strong. It's a partnership which may or may not have happened if Thacker -- and Target -- hadn't engaged in turning what could have been a problem into an opportunity.

I think that for us to be able to re-frame problems into solutions, we need to understand our own past, our own successes. Winston Churchill once said that "The future is unknowable, but the past should give us hope." By identifying challenges that we have already overcome, we gain confidence in facing and overcoming new challenges. A helpful exercise that I did years ago was to sit down and write about the five to ten biggest challenges that I had faced and how I had overcome them.

A key to being able to harvest courage -- and wisdom -- from our past is accepting and facing our past instead of hiding from it. What I mean by that is sometimes when we make it through a dark and challenging time, we do the equivalent of wiping the sweat from our brow, exhaling and saying "Whew! I'm glad that's done!" And then, because the challenge or the struggle was painful, we do our best to forget it. We cheat ourselves when we do that. There is learning to be gained. I like to think that the challenges I face are there to help me grow and learn and become a stronger, healthier and better person. In order for challenges to have that rich pay-off, I have to be willing to reflect on the experience: What happened? What did I learn? What did I do well? What would I change? What can I take with me for next time? This doesn't have to be a long, drawn out process. In fact, the more you do it, the easier and faster it becomes (thank goodness!). But there is courage, wisdom and future opportunities to be gained for such a small investment.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Running amok

I read an article in Fortune (March 31, 2008) regarding Eliot Spitzer. The author talked about Spitzer's complete lack of self-restraint, his temper, and his "schoolyard behavior." As I read the article, I couldn't help but think that here is a guy that clearly had the IQ to be successful, but what he lacked -- and what contributed to his demise -- was Emotional Intelligence (EQ). He had no idea how to, in the author's words, "behave like a grownup." If all the research on EQ hasn't convinced us how important it is to a person's success, Spitzer provides a terrific and convincing anecdotal case. Self-awareness and self-management are two of the cornerstones to EQ. In other words, "What am I feeling?" and "What should I do about it?" While both are important and you can't have self-management without self-awareness, think about that second question for a minute: What should I do about it? There is an implicit statement in that question: we have the power to choose how to respond. While this takes discipline and commitment, it is possible. When I read Team of Rivals about the cabinet that Abraham Lincoln assembled, I was completely inspired and humbled by the greatness Lincoln displayed by his choices in responding to those around him. When those closest to him wanted him to lash out at his detractors, Lincoln displayed wisdom, savvy, and utter greatness.

Labels: , ,

 

Powered by Blogger